I remember hating museums when I was a small kid. They always involved standing still, pottering a bit to the next exhibit, and then standing still again. It hurt! I figured that was normal; everybody else must just have been hiding their pain.
I later found out most people can potter and stand still for
extensive periods of time without hurting. Now that would be nice! I wanted that too. I entered
the medical circus and was prodded, scanned, injected, electrocuted, and operated
on. Nothing worked. Then we went for fighting symptoms: I got orthopaedic
soles. That made things a whole lot better. It just meant I had to always walk
around on shoes about two sizes too big.
Fast forward some ten years. I discover running. I run
without orthopaedic soles, and pretty much get away with it. If I run far it still hurts, but that's reasonable. But then Istart running on my forefoot. That is a game changer. I can run and run without
my feet protesting! Clearly, this way of running somehow avoids the problem I
have. I happily run a half marathon without foot issues. Even the full marathon
was no problem. So these feet of mine work, if you use them the right way. At
speed I can do that, but shouldn’t it be possible at a modest pace? At the
least, it’s worth the try.
I'm not sure what the difference is, really; but there are some clues. I have fairly high arches and short toes, so my weight rests on only a small part of my feet: the ball and the heel. Unless I wear soles; these distribute it over the entire foot. But clearly there is another way. Walking (for me) is a rather passive way of moving, while running isn't; I sort of hang in my muscles, rather than leaning on my joints. My toes are actively involved, and I suppose that's what they're for anyway. Could I walk in a more muscular way? Would that be as effective as spreading my weight over my entire foot?
I'm not sure what the difference is, really; but there are some clues. I have fairly high arches and short toes, so my weight rests on only a small part of my feet: the ball and the heel. Unless I wear soles; these distribute it over the entire foot. But clearly there is another way. Walking (for me) is a rather passive way of moving, while running isn't; I sort of hang in my muscles, rather than leaning on my joints. My toes are actively involved, and I suppose that's what they're for anyway. Could I walk in a more muscular way? Would that be as effective as spreading my weight over my entire foot?
My most often worn shoes, with my foot for comparison; the size difference is caused by the sole on the left
If I stand still (or sit, in order to take a pic) my toes barely touch the ground
If I'm on my forefoot my toes get some action!
One day I decided to buy a pair of low hiking shoes in my
own size. It was time to try this out! And then, when I knew I would have to be
in Blaenau anyway, I decided to go for a walk above the mine, rather than in
it. And do I did!
I tried to walk a bit like I run: on tiptoe. That’s a bit
weird at walking pace. I tried to use my toes as much as I could: make these
muscles work! And I also tried turning my feet in a bit, as I know I do that when I run.
Did it work? Well, to a certain extent! It did feel a bit
sore, but in the end I spent 80 minutes on my feet, and “a bit sore” is then
actually a massive success. I’m going to try this again! It would be so nice to
not need these soles. I have very little to lose and all to gain! I suspect
it’s using the feet too passively puts too much strain on the joints, a bit
like running with a heavy gait puts too much strain on your knees. Make your
muscles do the work your joints would otherwise end up doing and you’re
laughing! Stay tuned, this experiment is ongoing!
No comments:
Post a Comment