I raced through this book! I only recently blogged about finishing the previous one. And I wanted fiction this time.
When, many years ago, Room came out, it piqued my interest. But I can be a bit slow! I didn’t buy it at the time. And by now even a film has been made about it. But I got my proverbial together and ordered it. It arrived on time to be next in line after Emperor of Rome. Is there anybody who doesn’t know what this book is about? For in case of yes: a woman and her small son are locked up in a room, and have been so for years. The son has never been anywhere else. This much is clear from the cover of the book. The rest of this text contains spoiler alerts.
It’s a page-turner. It might not start fast, but that’s how I like it. I was quite into the daily routines of Room. But quite early only in the book, the woman decides it is time to try to make their escape. It becomes clear she has tried before, but not since the boy was born. But she thinks he is now so old he can be involved in an escape attempt. Additionally; she fears for her life as the man who is keeping them captive is in financial trouble, and what would he do if he can't afford food and energy for three people anymore? What happens if the mortgage lender repossesses the house?
The book is told from the perspective of the boy, and as far as he is concerned she seems to suddenly get the idea to try to escape. The reader assumes she has not thought of much else in the past seven years, but has only now decided to involve him. It is clear she hasn't been willing to admit to the boy that they are in a highly unusual, even traumatic, situation. But now she must.
They hatch a plan and manage to execute it. She first pretends the boy is ill, and later that he has died. She tells the man to take the body away and bury it somewhere far away. The boy is rolled into a carpet, and is instructed to play dead. The assumption is that the man will put the boy in the carpet in the back of his pick-up truck, without checking. And he will inevitably have to stop at traffic lights sometimes. The boy is instructed to then jump out and run for help.
It actually works out that way. So much could go wrong! But the book won't work if he doesn't make it out. So the boy runs to a dog walker, pursued by the abductor, and the dog walker doesn't trust the situation and phones the police. They show up pretty promptly.
The problem then is that the boy has only just turned five and has never before been outside Room. How on earth does he know where he came from? But the dog walker has a description of the car, and the boy remembers how often the car stopped or turned. The police have enough to go on. They find his mum.
This all went a bit fast for me. I have a bit of a long attention span! But that's OK. Because then you wonder how they will fare in the outside world.
The situation is fundamentally different for the woman and the boy. The woman has finally been released from a seven year nightmare. The boy has been ripped away from everything he knows except his mum. She wants to go outside and feel the sky and the rain and the sun, but he doesn't see the attraction. He is scared of rain, and perfectly happy to be in a confined space. And he isn't happy that if he is outside, he has to wear special sunglasses and a lot of sunblock.
The boy has to come to terms with the absolute avalanche of new things thrown at him. The woman has to deal with the intrusive press, the police wanting to take evidence, social services sticking their noses into what happens to the boy, having to deal with lawyers, and finding out that some people haven't really responded to her disappearance (or even on her return, with child) the way she had hoped. They are on completely different trajectories.
There were some scenes that raised my eyebrow. They both are something I would see as a safety breach. Soon after the woman is rescued and brought to a psychiatric hospital, her mother comes visiting, with her new partner. The woman's brother also shows up; he has a partner and small child. And only days later, after they probably have only spent a few minutes in each other's company in total, these relatives come and pick the boy up for a visit to a museum. The mother is having a bit of a breakdown and can't get out of bed, and the reader is given to believe she doesn't even know this is going on. What psychiatric clinic would allow a child like that to be taken away from the mother, for hours, without her consent? By practically strangers? That didn't seem plausible to me.
The other thing was that the woman is put on medication. And she is given such a large supply of it she is capable of plausibly attempting suicide with it. I would think she just gets her daily dose and not more.
The author also puts some societal criticism in. The boy grew up in scarcity; his captor is really not going to spend more on his prisoners than necessary. He is baffled at the over-abundance and waste, both in food and consumer goods, in the wider world. He is also puzzled by that everyone seems to be in a hurry.
The book ends with the boy wanting to go back to visit Room. They get permission. When he gets back there, it doesn't feel familiar anymore. You imagine he has peace with just not living there anymore. And then you have to imagine the rest of his life.
I thought it was beautiful! And I thought it was a plausible attempt to get inside the mind of a boy in a situation like that. I'm glad I finally read it. Only 15 years late!