Foram confusion

I tend to slightly dread the foram practical associated with our September fieldwork. So many forams, and so few staff to check their identifications. But this year, another complication arose. The students are asked to send me their data after the practical, and I assumed I would just collate all their data in one spreadsheet and then they could go and interpret it.

It didn't quite work out that way. I thought I had been hammering the point to the students that a sample of which you don't know the provenance is worthless. But I got loads of counts sent to me that didn't specify which sample they represented. That's not helping! And I collect the actual samples as well, so I can check, but these weren't very well labelled either. So I just had a spreadsheet with the samples I could match up; some of them were impeccable, with detailed and matching sample information on both document and microslide. But of some I just didn't know where they belonged. I hope the students can look at their notes, recognise their handwriting on the microslides, et cetera, and work out which sample is which. Because this data set is pretty rubbish! Next year I will have to personally check every single microslide to make sure it is obvious which sample is which…

Fine forams, but which sample are they from?